The disability
in the arts has not always been around. However, it refers to a more active
participation or representation of disabled people in the arts rather than the
actual context of the work being about disability. Also, art made by a disabled
person does not automatically become disability art just because it was a
disabled person produced the artwork. The content of the work could be anything
the only requirement for it to qualify as disability in the arts is if the
person qualifies as disabled.
There are plenty of
artists that fall under this category. We have Chuck Close that uses a powered
wheel-chair and easel to complete his art. He is unable to walk or use some of
his arm, but he still completes art. Then you have autistic and downs syndrome
people who complete artwork to sell. There are so many different types of
disabilities, but they all fall under this category.
The disability
art is the opposite of disability in the arts. The following theme can be any
art, theatre, fine arts, film, writing, music as long as it takes disability as
its theme or whose context relates to disability. The type of grouping does not
require the maker to be disabled; however the maker can indeed be disabled. For
example, Marc Quinn sculpted Alison Lapper pregnant which is another artist who
does not have any arms, and is considered a mouth painter. However, Quinn does
not have a disability, but if he did it would still be considered disability
art because of the content.
I have been
able to join the disability art community because the majority of my artwork
depicts those who have some kind of disability. My brother, who has Down
syndrome, has been the main focus for my work. As I continued my work I started
using his friends as models for my work as well. For my senior show, I
incorporated several mediums to describe my brother and his friends to bring
out the beautiful side of those with disabilities. Therefore, my artwork would
be considered disability art.
No comments:
Post a Comment